Abstract. 12. This text contains both Heidegger’s most extensive use of the term ‘horizon’ and his last use of it as a technical term. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Fusion of Horizons by Steve Thomason. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email, /doi/full/10.1080/09672550903164459?needAccess=true, International Journal of Philosophical Studies. We could see the ‘fusion of horizons’ as a metaphor for the consultation process, a simple image of what happens in a consultation, with patient and doctor interacting and resulting in changed horizons. 14 Being and Time, trans. Joan Stambaugh (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996), p. xix. It shows how the horizons of their thought at once support and question each other. This essay, originally published in 1957, contains his first published use of the phrase ‘the fusion of horizons’. Fusion of horizons – the hermeneutic circle It is the naming phenomena within language that places restrictions on language which Gadamer (2004a) endeavours to illuminate, arguing interpretations derived from such understandings always involve a fusion of horizons. possible process of the fusion of horizons in general. Hismother died of diabetes when Gadamer was only four, and he had nosurviving brothers or sisters. 13 For example, see ‘The Hermeneutics of Suspicion’, Man and World, 17(3/4) (1984), p. 316. (Gadamer, 1960, pg 375) Interpretation is critical to the process of understanding and Gadamer views that as a fusion of horizons, of which Polkinghorne (1983) describes as a dialectical interaction between the expectation of the interpreter and the meaning of the text. Hereafter TM. 3 Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, p. 295. I do this by showing how Gadamer is drawing on the technical sense of ‘horizon’ found in Edmund Husserl’s and Martin Heidegger’s phenomenologies. 446–51. Gadamer and the Fusion of Horizons . 1. Brice Wachterhauser (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994), p. 42. In the process I show why a prominent criticism of Gadamer’s account of the fusion of horizons, a criticism presented most forcefully by E. D. Hirsch, is mistaken. Gadamer's work can be split up into three broad areas: early work on Greek philosophy, specifically Plato, Truth and Method, and later essays. Registered in England & Wales No. 9 ‘What is Truth?’, in Hermeneutics and Truth, ed. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. “Horizon of interpretation changes continuously just as our visual horizon also varies with every step that we take” (Gadamer p61) For example, when we are reading a book, every time something different comes into our mind. It brings Gadamer and Ricoeur into a hermeneutical conversation with each other. Six Steps of Hermeneutical Process at H.-G. Gadamer Ştefan VLĂDUŢESCU 163 accommodation, commensurate, and, ultimately, a process of fusion of this horizons: “In our analysis of the hermeneutical process we saw that to acquire a horizon of interpretation requires a fusion of horizons” (Gadamer… Gadamer deals with such issues in his masterwork Truth and Method, offering resources through his understanding of the nature of texts and what he calls the fusion of horizons. Additionally, his dialogic approach, explained later as the Fusion of Horizons, is eminently Heideggerean. I do this by showing how Gadamer is drawing on the … Register to receive personalised research and resources by email, /doi/full/10.1080/09672550903164459?needAccess=true, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Restore content access for purchases made as guest. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Earlier, more Enlightenment-friendly hermeneutics agreed that the text was culturally and socially conditioned. Gadamer labeled the framework or range of meaning set by history a “horizon,” and stated that understanding or interpretation involves a “fusion of horizons.” According to theologian Grant R. Osborne, “Gadamer argues that…language and text are autonomous entities with a life of their own. 3 Truth and Method (New York: Crossroad, 1989), p. 302, italics his. Abstract Hans‐Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusions of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. 1 In ‘Gadamer’s Theory of Interpretation’, an appendix to his Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), pp. Recognizing Gadamer's notion of understanding as "play" will allow us to see more clearly the way in which understanding always remains a dynamic process in which difference is the life-blood. Abstract: A collection of essays bringing together and exploring the connections between two figures in twentieth-century hermeneutics, Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur. Article Purchase To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. The Conditions for The Fusion of Horizons In Gadamer’s hermeneutical philosophy, and the philosophy which, I think is, hermeneutical in Gadamer’s way, the following points are thought to be the necessary conditions for the text interpretation. Born on February 11, 1900, in Marburg, in Southern Germany,Gadamer grew up in Breslau (now Wroclaw in Poland), where his fatherwas Professor of Pharmacy at the University of Breslau, later takingthe Chair of Pharmaceutical Chemistry at Marburg. 446–51. I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what Gadamer means by ‘horizon’ and how then horizons are fused. 4 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990). This claim is a provocative one and announces one of the more memorable motifs in Gadamer’s writings. “Horizon of interpretation changes continuously just as our visual horizon also varies with every step that we take” (Gadamer p61) For example, when we are reading a book, every time something different comes into our mind. 245–264. For a detailed discussion of the development of the concept see Theodore Kisiel’s The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp. “It is not so much our judgements as it is our prejudices that constitute our being,” writes Hans-Georg Gadamer in the opening paper of a collection of his essays titled Philosophical Hermeneutics (Gadamer 1976). 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. Hans‐Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusions of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. 48 hours to view or download: In the process I show why a prominent criticism of Gadamer’s account of the fusion of horizons, a criticism presented most forcefully by E. D. Hirsch, is mistaken. By closing this message, you are consenting to our use of cookies. For Gadamer, such ‘understanding is not a matter of forgetting our own horizons of meanings and putting ourselves within that of the alien text or the alien society’ (Outhwaite, 1985) and therefore not a matter of‘detachment’; … The productivity of such difference is attested to by Gadamer’s statement in his “Afterword” to Truth and Method: “what I described as a fusion of horizons was the form in which this unity [of the meaning of a work and its effect] actualizes itself, which does not allow the interpreter to speak of an original meaning of the work without acknowledging that, in understanding it, the interpreter’s own meaning enters in as … Gadamer’s familybackground was Protestant, and his father was sternly Prussian. Start studying Gadamer 2. I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what Gadamer means by 'horizon' and how then horizons are fused. 3099067 The worry is that Gadamer's notion of the fusion of horizons commits us to a universality both in the sense that some shared understanding or overlap of horizons seems to be assumed as a presupposition of dialogue and communication, and in the sense that a kind of universality is itself effected through the fusion of horizons. I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what Gadamer means by ‘horizon’ and how then horizons are fused. in-between, we conclude our study with a consideration of how Gadamer‟s fusion of (intercultural) horizons offers us a model upon which we can conceive postcolonial space, a site of political mediation irreducible to colonialism or nativism, commensurabilism or incommensurabilism. Hans-Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusions of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. 12 | P a g e Fusion of horizon cannotbe fully achieved. 7 Phenomenology of Perception (New York: Humanities Press, 1962), p. 68. Thiselton draws from Gadamer’s “fusion of horizons” and argues that “the modern interpreter, no less than the text, stands in a given historical context and tradition” (Thiselton 11). fusion of horizons. 3099067 13 For example, see ‘The Hermeneutics of Suspicion’, Man and World, 17(3/4) (1984), p. 316. There are several ideas to explore on the way to developing our horizon as detailed by Gadamer. Showing an early interest in humanisticstudies, Gadamer began university studies i… 6 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), p. 44. And such expansion of horizon leads to the fusion of horizons. Gadamer's goal was to uncover the nature of human understanding. the merging of perspectives which in HERMENEUTICS is seen as an essential feature of the understanding of an unfamiliar TEXT or culture ( GADAMER, 1960). 245–264. 9 ‘What is Truth?’, in Hermeneutics and Truth, ed. It is an homage to my favorite philosopher, Hans Georg Gadamer to whom "fusion-of-horizons" was another name for how understanding, interpretation, knowledge, meaning and truth actually work. 7 Phenomenology of Perception (New York: Humanities Press, 1962), p. 68. Brice Wachterhauser (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1994), p. 42. For a detailed discussion of the development of the concept see Theodore Kisiel’s The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp. Joan Stambaugh (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1996), p. xix. I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what Gadamer means by ‘horizon’ and how then horizons are fused. Hereafter TM. 235 READERS, TEXTS, AND THE FUSION OF HORIZONS question then arises as to how, and Gadamer provides reflections which address just such a question.2 This essay deals with Gadamer and his understanding of horizons and hermeneutics, that is to say, the dynamic between reader and text. Fusion of horizons is a dialectical concept which results from the rejection of two alternatives: objectivism, whereby the objectification of the … 6 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973), p. 44. Fusion of horizons – the hermeneutic circle It is the naming phenomena within language that places restrictions on language which Gadamer (2004a) endeavours to 1 In ‘Gadamer’s Theory of Interpretation’, an appendix to his Validity in Interpretation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967), pp. 30 days to view or download: Hans-Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusion of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. It will also allow us to retrieve the context in which we can better grasp the meaning of the fusion of horizons. For Gadamer, interpreting a text involves a fusion of horizons (Horizontverschmelzung). I argue that in fact it is an excellent account of the successful resolution of dialogue, but only in light of a proper understanding of what Gadamer means by ‘horizon’ and how then horizons are fused. We use cookies to improve your website experience. USD 44.00 We use cookies to improve your website experience. Hans‐Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusions of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. USD 348.00 Fusion of horizon cannot be fully achieved. This essay, originally published in 1957, contains his first published use of the phrase ‘the fusion of horizons’. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. Abstract . And when we read the same sentence again and again, we understand it more properly.EXAMPLES OF FUSION OF … 16 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 267, italics his. 3 Truth and Method (New York: Crossroad, 1989), p. 302, italics his. 235 READERS, TEXTS, AND THE FUSION OF HORIZONS question then arises as to how, and Gadamer provides reflections which address just such a question.2 This essay deals with Gadamer and his understanding of horizons and hermeneutics, that is to say, the dynamic between reader and text. 14 Being and Time, trans. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Gadamer's Fusion of Horizons and Intercultural Interpretation, Library and Archives Canada (2009) 16 (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1982), p. 267, italics his. I do this by showing how Gadamer is drawing on the technical sense of ‘horizon’ found in Edmund Husserl’s and Martin Heidegger’s phenomenologies. 4 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990). This text contains both Heidegger’s most extensive use of the term ‘horizon’ and his last use of it as a technical term. Gadamer thus resisted attempting to articulate a timeless method of hermeneutics and was more intrigued by identifying the conditions of the interpretive style. Both the text and the interpreter find themselves within a particular historical tradition, or “horizon.” Each horizon is expressed through the medium of language, and both text and interpreter belong to and participate in history and language. Taking as its central motif Hans-Georg Gadamer’s claim that “the true locus of hermeneutics is [the] in-between,” this thesis defends Gadamer’s concept of the fusion of horizons as radically interstitial against recent allegations that link his project to Romantic interpretive commensurability. Add to cart, Registered in England & Wales No. Hans‐Georg Gadamer is often criticized for his account of the fusions of horizons as the ideal resolution of dialogue. Add to cart, Issue Purchase